Send Message Send Message
Cohen, Snyder, Eisenberg & Katzenberg, P.A. - Maryland Personal Injury Lawyers
We are open for business and may be reached by telephone or email. Our night & weekend number, 410-332-0045, is also available to speak to an attorney, as usual.

Did Hospital Adequately Warn, Review Records on Stent Implants?

We initially reported on allegations of medical stents being improperly placed into potentially hundreds of patients at St. Joseph Medical Center in Towson in August, when the matter first began to assume media prominence.

Since then, the medical malpractice story has grown in all dimensions. In an October update, we noted the filing of several lawsuits in the matter, and we followed up further in a November post that focused on Dr. Mark G. Midei's first public comments in the case.

Many media stories have routinely focused on Dr. Midei's personal liability for the stents implanted into patients unnecessarily while he was supervisor of the hospital's cardiac catheterization lab.

Liability questions obviously swirl around the hospital, as well, and it has taken strong actions over the past months to isolate itself from Midei and to stress that it has acted responsibly and with due care toward patients.

Some medical experts question whether the hospital has done enough. It has been noted, for example, that there is marked variance between the findings of the hospital's internal investigation and the rhetoric in the letters it later sent to approximately 600 patients.

As to the former, hospital doctors noted "the substantial likelihood of harm" to many of Midei's patients, as well as "the potential for serious complications" arising from the stent implants. In the letter sent by St. Joseph administrators, that type of wording and tone is absent, with patients merely being informed that the subsequent clinical review "was different than the original report and may be relevant to your ongoing care and treatment."

The hospital also limited its review to cases going back no further than two years, noting that the risk of clotting was greatly diminished after that period. Medical experts also question that decision. "I can't see any reason why it would be defensible to limit the review of cases to the previous two years," says Robert. M Veatch, professor of medical ethics at Georgetown University.

"I think they should go back as far as necessary to inform patients," states Dr. Robert Truog, the director of clinical ethics at Harvard Medical School.

Dr. David Holmes, a Mayo Clinic cardiologist, says that all relevant data needs to be disclosed, without regard to timelines, "so lessons can be learned from it."

Related Resource: "St. Joseph should review additional Midei cases" December 12, 2010

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • AABA
Email Us For A Response

How can we help you?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Cohen, Snyder, Eisenberg & Katzenberg, P.A. - Maryland Personal Injury Lawyers

Cohen, Snyder, Eisenberg & Katzenberg, P.A.

347 N Charles St
Baltimore, MD 21201

Phone: 443-529-0795
Baltimore Law Office Map

153 W Patrick St
Suite A
Frederick, MD 21701

Phone: 443-529-0795
Frederick Law Office Map

112 W Pennsylvania Ave
Suite 302
Bel Air, MD 21014

Phone: 443-529-0795
Bel Air Law Office Map

7420 Baltimore Annapolis Blvd
Suite 2
Glen Burnie, MD 21061

Phone: 443-529-0795
Glen Burnie Law Office Map

1760 Eastern Blvd
Essex, MD 21221

Phone: 443-529-0795
Essex Law Office Map

1 Olympic Place
Suite 900
Towson, MD 21204

Phone: 443-529-0795
Map & Directions